This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgOn Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:20:47PM +0100, Thomas Ansorg wrote: > hello > ok, lets try it again: > do the oml and rsl settings have to be identical? for example: one bts > is set to port 0, ts 1, tei 25. the cfg entry would be "oml e1 line 0 > timeslot 1 sub-slot full" and "rsl e1 line 0 timeslot 1 sub-slot full", > right? > > the cited link is useless, i kno it already, doesnt answer my question. > what i wanted to know is why we have 2 types of settings (oml and rsl) > which are identical, cause that told the openbsc.cfg. why do we need 2 > settings that configure the same? or was the assumption above wrong? why is it so difficult to understand that two different LAPD connections (on different SAPI) can either co-incide on the same E1 timeslot or run on different ones? Some BTSs support this (like Ericsson RBS2000), and OpenBSC supports it, too. Also, if you use A-bis concentrators, you might have even more than two LAPD connections on the same timeslot. -- - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. -- Linus