This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Maradona Mossiba andaluz.coder at gmail.comOk cool, thnx Stuart. Is this info based on technical specs of the 139 model? On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stuart Baggs <stuart at bluewave.im> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > The ip.access nanoBTS (at least model 139) do implement timing advance. We > have used them in a macro network coupled with 24 AMPS for nearly a year now > and they work quite effectively. They work right up to the 25 KM timing > advance limit. > > Kind Regards > > Stuart Baggs > > BlueWave Communications Ltd - Suppliers of IP pico/femto cells. > > On 22 Feb 2011, at 15:08, Nordin wrote: > > > Hello guys, > > > > I haven't been busy with openbsc for a while, however, I was following > the mailing-list. > > I have the following question, is timing advance also implemented for the > nanoBTS? Cause I don't really know where to look in the sources, thank you. > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20110223/6f6524fb/attachment.htm>