This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Kurtis Heimerl kheimerl at cs.berkeley.eduAnything OpenBTS is doing wrong?
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013, Pavel Baturko wrote:
> Thanks for explanations and fast fix! It seems that now all works as
> should be.
>
> Pavel
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '246tnt at gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> The fix Andreas just pushed is what I suspected: A missing 'return'
>> that made the "ignore" casei, not really ignored.
>>
>> What seems to happen is:
>> - We respond to the assignement a bit fast it seems and OpenBTS
>> doesn't see the first SABM at all (not in the OpenBTS trace at all)
>> - When OpenBTS sees the SABM, it responds with the UA frame
>> - OpenBTS doesn't send a new frame until quite a bit later, which
>> means the UA frame is resent several times by OpenBTS transceiver
>> application using it's filling table (which is why we see only 1 UA
>> frame in OpenBTS trace but multiple of them in the OsmocomBB trace)
>> - OsmocomBB had a bug where it was supposed to ignore the extraneous
>> UA frame but instead was dropping the connection because of a missing
>> "return" inside the switch statement.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Sylvain
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20130108/fd6bb125/attachment.htm>