This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Pavel Baturko pabftk at gmail.comThanks for explanations and fast fix! It seems that now all works as should be. Pavel On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com> wrote: > The fix Andreas just pushed is what I suspected: A missing 'return' > that made the "ignore" casei, not really ignored. > > What seems to happen is: > - We respond to the assignement a bit fast it seems and OpenBTS > doesn't see the first SABM at all (not in the OpenBTS trace at all) > - When OpenBTS sees the SABM, it responds with the UA frame > - OpenBTS doesn't send a new frame until quite a bit later, which > means the UA frame is resent several times by OpenBTS transceiver > application using it's filling table (which is why we see only 1 UA > frame in OpenBTS trace but multiple of them in the OsmocomBB trace) > - OsmocomBB had a bug where it was supposed to ignore the extraneous > UA frame but instead was dropping the connection because of a missing > "return" inside the switch statement. > > Cheers, > > Sylvain > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20130108/c28f84f8/attachment.htm>