should we continue to focus on nuttx?

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Mon Apr 30 16:02:16 UTC 2012


Hi Denis,

there was no decision on OsmoDevCon, apart from some opinions.

I'm not aware of anyone actually having reviewed/evaluated rockbox at
this point.

The general point was that we apparently don't really _need_ a "full OS"
like NuttX, but there are other solutions like rockbox that may bring in
other useful parts like a UI for low-resolution dot-matrix displays.

I guess until somebody actually tries and experiments with an early port
of rockbox to the calypso, we won't know what is the best way to move
forward :/

And in general, everybody seems to be busy with lots of other things, so
I'm not sure if (and when) that might happen.

Regards,
	Harald

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




More information about the baseband-devel mailing list