This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli GNUtoo at no-log.orgThe other day on IRC I was told that: >Apr 29 00:34:36 <Hoernchen> last thing i heard was that nuttx was superseded in favor of a more lightweight solution And: >Apr 29 00:41:03 <steve|m> http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OsmoDevCon2012/Minutes#a18:30roundtablerectangulartableonOsmocomBB which was made back in march(we also started working on nuttx near march) and contains the following: >laf: summary we could not gain much from nuttx, rockbox could provide use with UI (inspiration)? steve: framebuffer is mosly compatible I wasn't aware of all that. Also I don't have much details on what was said since I wans't there... Should me and Alan Carvalho de Assis continue the work we are doing? What is the current plan? our status is here: http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/nuttx-bb/drivers The current work on my side is to: * make serial work without sercomm(done locally,just some configuration change) * unbreak the booting of the calypso(require serial to work without sercomm,the commit that created the problem has been identified, how to fix is a work in progress) * I also tried to change toolchain(I generated a toolchain with openembedded) to see if it fixed the issue but according to Gregory it's not the right fix. * I also identified some dummy functions in the nuttx version of sercomm that we should get rid of. On Alan Carvalho de Assis side : he's trying to make the keypad work but he has some difficulties with it. Denis.