11 Jul
2017
11 Jul
'17
3:36 p.m.
Hi.
I've noticed that we do not use check_PROGRAMS in any of our Makefile.am (happy to be
corrected :) so all the tests/ binaries are built during "make" step instead of
"make
check".
Is this intentional? If so - why? Is this smth we'd rather fix?
--
Max Suraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
12 Jul
12 Jul
3:17 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:36:01PM +0200, Max wrote:
Hi.
I've noticed that we do not use check_PROGRAMS in any of our Makefile.am (happy to
be
corrected :) so all the tests/ binaries are built during "make" step instead of
"make
check".
Is this intentional? If so - why? Is this smth we'd rather fix?
I remember at least sometimes having binaries built only during 'make check'
... there are some check_PROGRAMS around our repositories. I personally don't
care much either way; having test binaries built during 'make' forces me to fix
the test builds along right away, not only when I remember to run 'make check',
which can be helpful or get in the way depending on the situation. We can
change to use check_PROGRAMS everywhere, but there are other more important
things to care about (unless there are packaging / release implications).
~N
2482
days inactive
2483
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Max -
Neels Hofmeyr