Hello, I was going on with the autotools cleanup (in order of listing in cgit) but I'm a bit surprised about the libosmo-sccp structure, which contrarily to libosmocore, libosmo-abis and libosmo-dsp is not using libtool, but it's actually building three static archives, with one source file each. Now, I don't know if it might be too late to consider changing this but I'm wondering why it has been done this way; when using a shared object it might make sense (although the overhead of using more than one object is probably higher than loading the unused code), but with static archives all the Unix link editors I know only take by default only the objects that are actually needed by what it's being linked; that is using a single libosmo-sccp.a will only bring in the final linking the object files that are actually needed. I also wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to have everything built in the same project/source tree with libosmocore — in general this seems to be small enough, and the time/space spent for these three files is probably well recovered by the extra ./configure run that it has to run. Let me know if I can be of help — I'll still send the autotools cleanup for this project today I think. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flameeyes(a)flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/