Hi list, I'm noticing an inaccuracy/ambiguity in the stat counters concerning Location Updating. So far we have: struct gsmnet_stats { struct { struct osmo_counter *reject; <-- inc when MM LU Reject is sent struct osmo_counter *accept; <-- inc when MM LU Accept is sent } loc_upd_resp; } Looks good? Well, not entirely. (1) When we use TMSIs, we first send a LU Accept with a new TMSI, and then expect the MS to respond with a TMSI Realloc Complete message. When that fails to come through, the LU actually ends in failure, even though a LU Accept was sent. (2) In 3G, if a UE sends an Iu Release during LU (e.g. user enables flight mode), we cancel the LU without sending any reply at all, so nothing would be counted. I would like to change the naming and inc hooks to reflect actual LU success or failure. We don't need to count the actual messages sent, right? ~Neels -- - Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Alt-Moabit 93 * 10559 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschäftsführer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte
While at it you might also use rate_ctr instead of counter. This way I'll have more example for docs :) On 05/09/2016 12:40 PM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
Hi list,
I'm noticing an inaccuracy/ambiguity in the stat counters concerning Location Updating. So far we have:
struct gsmnet_stats {
struct { struct osmo_counter *reject; <-- inc when MM LU Reject is sent struct osmo_counter *accept; <-- inc when MM LU Accept is sent } loc_upd_resp; }
Looks good? Well, not entirely.
(1) When we use TMSIs, we first send a LU Accept with a new TMSI, and then expect the MS to respond with a TMSI Realloc Complete message. When that fails to come through, the LU actually ends in failure, even though a LU Accept was sent.
(2) In 3G, if a UE sends an Iu Release during LU (e.g. user enables flight mode), we cancel the LU without sending any reply at all, so nothing would be counted.
I would like to change the naming and inc hooks to reflect actual LU success or failure. We don't need to count the actual messages sent, right?
~Neels
-- Max Suraev <msuraev@sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Alt-Moabit 93 * 10559 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte
participants (2)
-
Max -
Neels Hofmeyr