Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/28816 ) Change subject: add ps_rab_ass FSM to map GTP via UPF ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File include/osmocom/hnbgw/hnbgw.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/28816/comment/68ef4966_d3888780 PS2, Line 193: /* Return true when the user configured GTP mapping to be enabled, by configuring a PFCP link to a UPF. If a current setup without GTP-U proxy in SGSN (or HNBGW) is broken, then I think there is an unrelated bug that should be fixed. see https://projects.sysmocom.de/issues/5435#note-16 I really don't think we should *enforce* the use of a GTP-U proxy / upf. The only real reason to use it is in situations where thre is no transparent routing of IP packets between RAN and CN - which is basically the case in probably almost every larger-scale commercial network out there. Just in lab / private networks this is an option. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/28816 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic9bc30f322c4c6c6e82462d1da50cb15b336c63a Gerrit-Change-Number: 28816 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:48:00 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment