Attention is currently required from: neels. Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-pfcp/+/28754 to look at the new patch set (#3). Change subject: apply code review: refactor pfcp_endpoint API ...................................................................... apply code review: refactor pfcp_endpoint API Code review requested that the API should use functions instead of direct access to a struct. I have moved all user provided config to a separate struct osmo_pfcp_endpoint_cfg, to be passed to osmo_pfcp_endpoint_create(). Halfway through those changes, I am not so certain whether that is what reviewers had in mind. It makes sense from the point of view to keep nr of arguments passed to osmo_pfcp_endpoint_create() small, and to allow changing the user provided config without requiring a new osmo_pfcp_endpoint_create2() API function. Though that again has ABI compat problems, and makes no sense from the point of view that all access should be done via API functions. Personally I don't really agree with this change, which is probably the reason why this patch ended up this way. Related: SYS#5599 Change-Id: If80c35c6a942bf9593781b5a6bc28ba37323ce5e --- M include/osmocom/pfcp/pfcp_endpoint.h M src/libosmo-pfcp/pfcp_cp_peer.c M src/libosmo-pfcp/pfcp_endpoint.c 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmo-pfcp refs/changes/54/28754/3 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-pfcp/+/28754 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-pfcp Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If80c35c6a942bf9593781b5a6bc28ba37323ce5e Gerrit-Change-Number: 28754 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset