Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.

fixeria has posted comments on this change by fixeria. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/42838?usp=email )

Change subject: server: fix misleading data length validation log message ......................................................................

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcap/+/42838/comment/ee1ce67e_335a38d8?usp... : PS1, Line 14: Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

I think I'll start adding my cat as a co-author of all my patches, for giving me so much support whi […]

It's not about advertising specific tools I used while writing these patches. It's just an explicit indication for reviewers that AI **was** used. Some projects like Wireshark do require such a statement in commit messages, even if it was not used at all.

In this specific patchset it was used to find problems (as a static analyzer). Some fixes were proposed by AI, and I took them as-is or with a bit of tweaking. I've carefully checked them before submitting. Some of them I wrote myself, but generated the commit messages.

If you would prefer more neutral indications, like `AI-Used: yes`, please let me know.

P.S. If your cats could find memleaks or NULL-derefs for you, I would personally be fine with such statements in commit messages ;)