This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.
Viktor Tsymbalyuk viktor.tsymbalyuk at gmail.comHello Pau,
Thank you for detailed answer.
> Can you please submit the patch to gerrit?
yes, I'll do it. But please give me some time. gerrit - is a new
challenge for me))))
Thank you.
--
Viktor
On 2018-01-24 17:18, Pau Espin Pedrol wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> indeed, you found a bug I introduced in osmo-ggsn
> 2d6a69e69a4b4cb2b8cc63c4810dae44e5a4d8f6, sorry for that, I didn't
> notice it since I was testing it with osmo-sgsn instead of using sgsnemu.
>
> You patch is fine, but I'd argue it would be more correct to use "< 1"
> for the condition since it now returns the amount of addresses parsed
> (or -1 in case of error). And better add whitespace in the comparison.
>
> Can you please submit the patch to gerrit? Add a reference to its
> description:
> Fixes: 2d6a69e69a4b4cb2b8cc63c4810dae44e5a4d8f6 ("Add support for
> IPv4v6 End User Addresses")
>
> You can add me as reviewer.
>
> Also please note that sgsnemu doesn't yet support IPv4v6 EUAs as
> opposed to osmo-ggsn. I only added support for it (in the commit
> introducing the bug) because modems in osmo-gsm-tester were using that
> one and I needed to support it in osmo-ggsn to have the tests working.
> As I never used sgsnemu before, I only patched it to account for the
> changes in libgtp but without adding the support for the new feature
> there.
>
> Regards,
>