This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Minh,
first of all, thanks for helping out in terms of OsmoPCU/OsmoBTS bug
hunting, it is much appreciated. It is a collaborative project, after
all :)
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:32:12AM -0400, Minh-Quang Nguyen wrote:
> After an investigation, we observe that the 'pcu_rx_rts_req' function
> in pcu_l1_if.cpp receives invalid block number from BTS.
>
> Looking at the BTS side, the calculation of L1SAP_FN2PTCCHBLOCK
> defined as '#define L1SAP_FN2PTCCHBLOCK(fn) ((fn / 52) & 7)' does not
> seem to be valid for expected PTCCH block numbers B0, B1,B2,B3 defined
> in Table 6 in TS 05.02 version 8.11.0.
>
> What do you think about re-define the calculation of the L1SAP_FN2PTCCHBLOCK?
If you find the existing calculation is not agreeing with the
specification (I'd have to re-read the spec, but I trust you when you
say that), I would appreciate if you could send a patch (or patch
series) that changes it to be within the spec. If the calculation is
more complex, better use a separate function than the simplistic macro.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)