This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Hans Peter Freyther hfreyther at sysmocom.deOn Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 04:19:34PM +0100, Andreas Eversberg wrote: > dear holger, dear andreas, > > i added serveral fixes that showed up with your test code. i have pushed > them to the jolly/allocation-fixes branch. in also includes a fix for > the missing incrementation of 'i' in select_first_ts() and > select_ul_slots(). I merged your changes and the crazy test that tested all combinations started to work so I went ahead an merged your change. What Daniel (and the jenkins) noticed is that I didn't update the test result. I asked him to update the test result but he pointed out that there appears to be a genuine regression: @@ -409,7 +409,6 @@ PDCH[5] is first common for DL PDCH[5] is used for UL PDCH[6] is used for UL -PDCH[7] is used for UL PDCH[5] is control_ts for UL PDCH[5] is first common for UL PDCH[5] is used for DL @@ -420,7 +419,6 @@ Testing jolly example PDCH[1] is used for UL PDCH[2] is used for UL -PDCH[3] is used for UL PDCH[1] is control_ts for UL PDCH[1] is first common for UL PDCH[1] is used for DL so it appears that the multislot algorithm started to not assign/use the last timeslot. Could you please have a look at that? > i have no fix for the USF problem. if the first_common_ts on concurrent > TBFs is different, we should reject the TBF by sending a Packet Access > Reject, but this message is also not implemented. I will add a todo to the code. -- - Holger Freyther <hfreyther at sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Schivelbeiner Str. 5 * 10439 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte