git tree / branches / ancestor?

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Tue Jul 10 23:23:29 UTC 2012


Hi all!

while reviewing the current PCU code in the git repository, it occurred
to me that somehow the jolly_new branch doesn't seem to be based on
master, and the only common ancestor is
9b06ff0c4c49f1927b9029d38e16670a7b7301fb from June 15.

In fact, Ivan seems to have made a number of changes concurrently with
Andreas, but not basing on each other's code.  It's really a big mess,
from what I can tell.

I'm referring to the followign commit's by Ivan:
a9e6dc5084627e7c279ba08de7a7809e97ebc539
d78ee736239414021fde8010179f42b86464a238

Which are completely unrelated to the work that Andreas has been doing
at the same time (all his commit's from 2012-06-27 on, i.e.
39621c41f303e24b7324dc4c91447a449d2a654b and later.

I strongly recomend that you coordinate more and re-view each others'
code better.

And regarding the messy situatin with master vs. jolly_new:  I think the
only practical solution is to drop one of the two parallel and
incompatible changes regarding the RLC/MAC and TBF establishment
changes.

Do you have any input on how to resolve this specific issue?  I think
none of us can afford to waste resources on duplication of work and
creating virtually un-mergeable branches :/

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




More information about the osmocom-net-gprs mailing list