nuttx-bb layout? inside or outside nuttx?

Craig Comstock craig_comstock at yahoo.com
Sun Sep 25 13:32:55 UTC 2016


Hi,
I am working on porting nuttx-bb to fernvale (mediatek 6260/6261). I was starting work with gnutoo's sources which seem to be pulling osmocom-bb into nuttx/apps/osmocomBB and yet I feel like previous nuttx-bb was using osmocom alongside nuttx (so that osmocom-bb is kept by itself). This second layout seems better to me... so that osmocom-bb is more "preserved" as-is. I know there are differences in the code environments but it seems those could be handled by making macros in nuttx so that nuttx can compile osmocom code.
Any suggestions?
My work in progress... on nuttx-bb
https://github.com/craigcomstock/fernvale-nuttx/tree/nuttx-bb

this osmocomBB/osmocomBB seems to want to pull in bits from osmocom-bb/src/target/firmware
https://github.com/craigcomstock/fernvale-nuttx/tree/nuttx-bb/apps/osmocomBB/osmocomBB

here is a more "clean" structure of mediatek code that I put into osmocom-bb thinking I would migrate to side-by-side layouthttps://github.com/craigcomstock/osmocom-bb/tree/mt626x
all is very much a WIP,Craig

      From: Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com>
 To: Holger Freyther <holger at freyther.de> 
Cc: "osmocom-sdr at lists.osmocom.org" <osmocom-sdr at lists.osmocom.org>; baseband-devel <baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org>; OpenBSC Mailing List <openbsc at lists.osmocom.org>; gmr at lists.osmocom.org
 Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 9:01 AM
 Subject: Re: Moving from trac to a single redmine
   
Hi,


> * not modify trac sites but use redirect of nginx

I've just put this in place for 'openbsc.osmocom.org' :

rewrite ^/trac/wiki/(.*)/(.*)$
$scheme://osmocom.org/projects/openbsc/wiki/$1$2 redirect;
rewrite ^/trac/wiki(.*)$ $scheme://osmocom.org/projects/openbsc/wiki$1 redirect;

This seems to work fairly well. I'm sure there are some exceptions to
those regexps, but I couldn't find any immediately. If we uncover them
we can try to tweak them or just handle them manually.

I've set them to temporary (302) redirects for now. Once we're a
little more confident that this works well, this can be changed to
301s and extended to all the other old domains.

If you find any case where those fails, please report.


Cheers,

    Sylvain


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20160925/83cb8290/attachment.html>


More information about the baseband-devel mailing list