This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Craig Comstock craig_comstock at yahoo.comHi, I am working on porting nuttx-bb to fernvale (mediatek 6260/6261). I was starting work with gnutoo's sources which seem to be pulling osmocom-bb into nuttx/apps/osmocomBB and yet I feel like previous nuttx-bb was using osmocom alongside nuttx (so that osmocom-bb is kept by itself). This second layout seems better to me... so that osmocom-bb is more "preserved" as-is. I know there are differences in the code environments but it seems those could be handled by making macros in nuttx so that nuttx can compile osmocom code. Any suggestions? My work in progress... on nuttx-bb https://github.com/craigcomstock/fernvale-nuttx/tree/nuttx-bb this osmocomBB/osmocomBB seems to want to pull in bits from osmocom-bb/src/target/firmware https://github.com/craigcomstock/fernvale-nuttx/tree/nuttx-bb/apps/osmocomBB/osmocomBB here is a more "clean" structure of mediatek code that I put into osmocom-bb thinking I would migrate to side-by-side layouthttps://github.com/craigcomstock/osmocom-bb/tree/mt626x all is very much a WIP,Craig From: Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com> To: Holger Freyther <holger at freyther.de> Cc: "osmocom-sdr at lists.osmocom.org" <osmocom-sdr at lists.osmocom.org>; baseband-devel <baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org>; OpenBSC Mailing List <openbsc at lists.osmocom.org>; gmr at lists.osmocom.org Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 9:01 AM Subject: Re: Moving from trac to a single redmine Hi, > * not modify trac sites but use redirect of nginx I've just put this in place for 'openbsc.osmocom.org' : rewrite ^/trac/wiki/(.*)/(.*)$ $scheme://osmocom.org/projects/openbsc/wiki/$1$2 redirect; rewrite ^/trac/wiki(.*)$ $scheme://osmocom.org/projects/openbsc/wiki$1 redirect; This seems to work fairly well. I'm sure there are some exceptions to those regexps, but I couldn't find any immediately. If we uncover them we can try to tweak them or just handle them manually. I've set them to temporary (302) redirects for now. Once we're a little more confident that this works well, this can be changed to 301s and extended to all the other old domains. If you find any case where those fails, please report. Cheers, Sylvain -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20160925/83cb8290/attachment.htm>