issue with burst_ind
246tnt at gmail.com
Sun Jun 17 07:01:13 UTC 2012
> i checked with real network also but i found that count of IMM_ASS from
> burst_ind ccch_scan is very less than no of count of ccch_scan of sylvain
> testing branch.
Well yeah ... that's obvious if you understand what those actually do ..
in burst_ind at each immediate assignement, it will _follow_ it and go
to dedicated mode until the channel is ended. So during all the time
it is in dedicated mode, it won't be listening to CCCH anymore and so
it will miss all the immediate assigmenet that happen during that
More information about the baseband-devel