issue with burst_ind

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.

Akib Sayyed akibsayyed at gmail.com
Sun Jun 17 07:04:41 UTC 2012


oops sorry i didnt explained details i commented the part that follows
IMMASS.
actually i tried to listen my OpenBTS's ARFCN and tryed to place a call.
but i didnt saw any IMM ASS so i
commented code that follows iMM ASS. then i saw only IMM ASS and paging
request but those were less than actual :(

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com> wrote:

> > i checked with real network also but i found that count of IMM_ASS from
> > burst_ind ccch_scan is very less than no of count of ccch_scan of sylvain
> > testing branch.
>
> Well yeah ... that's obvious if you understand what those actually do ..
>
> in burst_ind at each immediate assignement, it will _follow_ it and go
> to dedicated mode until the channel is ended. So during all the time
> it is in dedicated mode, it won't be listening to CCCH anymore and so
> it will miss all the immediate assigmenet that happen during that
> time.
>
> Cheers,
>
>    Sylvain
>



-- 
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed at gmail.com
akibsayyed at matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120617/14ef4a1e/attachment.htm>


More information about the baseband-devel mailing list