[PATCH] uart: make *_UART_NR platform independent
laforge at gnumonks.org
Sat May 7 10:13:50 UTC 2011
Regarding the UART numbers. My view on this is:
1) I agree with Sylvain that the driver should simply take a uart-number
as input, and what that number maps to should be SoC-specific.
2) We should either
a) have a #define for every board (not SoC), which is something like
#define CONS_UART_NR 0" and which is then used in the actual
callers of the uart driver, or
b) have a global board-configuration structure which gets filled in by the
board_init() code, which then contains a boardcf->cons_uart_nr
member whihc can be used by the callers of the uart driver.
'2a' requires that we modify our build system to make per-board
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the baseband-devel