post a new release

Lucas Teske lucas at teske.net.br
Sun Mar 6 02:25:28 UTC 2016


Ok so I merged some forks into mine. I'll wait for Joseph to add me as a 
librtlsdr organization member to merge it with the organization repo.

https://github.com/racerxdl/librtlsdr

So basically I added the SDR# manual gains change to the librtlsdr ( 
from https://sourceforge.net/projects/sdrr820tmanualgainsettings/ )
Then I merged Hayati changes to the DC Filter from 
https://github.com/hayguen/librtlsdr

I am taking a look into Alexander Kurpiers changes ( 
https://github.com/dl8aau/librtlsdr/tree/devel1 ) before merging because 
he did a lot more commits and also he also added the Manual Gains to the 
code. So I will take a look and test both codes.

Lucas

Em 05/03/2016 15:59, Lucas Teske escreveu:
> Sure! That is good! :D
>
> If you can add me, I will in a few hours have some free time to merge 
> my fork changes into it.
>
> Also anyone that have a working fork please send the link to the repos 
> so I can check it.
>
> On 05/03/2016 14:47, Joseph Poirier wrote:
>> fyi - I just created a librtlsdr organization on github 
>> (github.com/librtlsdr <http://github.com/librtlsdr>) and cloned 
>> https://github.com/steve-m/librtlsdr to it.
>>
>> It would be nice to aggregate a list of the most interesting forks 
>> and attempt to merge some of the features and/or fixes in, and 
>> possibly get this fork tagged as the canonical fork for packages, 
>> users, etc. If we can get some sort of a majority approval that is.
>>
>> I'll be more than happy to add permissions for people and/or pass it 
>> off to someone that might have more time than myself to manage.
>>
>> cheers,
>> joe
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:50 PM, A. Maitland Bottoms 
>> <bottoms at debian.org> wrote:
>>
>>     Henk writes:
>>      > Oeps, sorry forgot to quote the original post of joseph.
>>      >
>>      > +1
>>      > Hmm in my opinion rtl_sdr is the next best thing since the
>>     invention
>>      > of canned beer :) since it liberated the airwaves for allot of
>>     users.
>>      >
>>      > Regards,
>>      > henk
>>      >
>>      > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Joseph Poirier
>>     <jdpoirier at gmail.com <mailto:jdpoirier at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>      > > If would be nice to have a newer official release available;
>>     installation
>>      > > using the package manager on many Linux distros gets a two
>>     year old
>>      > > librtlsdr that's missing the rtlsdr_set_tuner_bandwidth
>>     function (added
>>      > > about nine months ago), as well as, other nice updates and
>>     fixes.
>>      > >
>>      > > cheers,
>>      > > joe
>>
>>     Oh yes, Debian Jessie did not release with rtlsdr bandwidth
>>     setting code.
>>     But, the rtl-sdr currently available in Debian unstable, testing and
>>     jessie-backports include current git HEAD code - v0.5.3-12-ge3c03f7.
>>     (based upon git://git.osmocom.org/rtl-sdr.git
>>     <http://git.osmocom.org/rtl-sdr.git>)
>>
>>     So, while the Debian source package starts from the v0.5.3 tag, I use
>>     the 3.0 (quilt) source format to also include more recent git
>>     commits.
>>     https://sources.debian.net/src/rtl-sdr/0.5.3-5/debian/patches/
>>
>>     Ubuntu Wily Werewolf and Xenial Xerus also contain rtl-sdr based on
>>     v0.5.3-12-ge3c03f7.
>>
>>     A release would be good. I'd be happy to reduce the amount of stuff
>>     in the debian/ packaging directory - the various man pages could
>>     be adopted upstream, as well as the improve-librtlsdr-pc-file and
>>     improve-scanning-range-parsing patches.
>>
>>     And a gpg signed tarball release, or even just a gpg signed tag
>>     would be a help in establishing source code integrity. A new release
>>     for osmocom might indeed help synchronize the various distributions.
>>
>>     Thanks for keeping me informed,
>>     -Maitland
>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-sdr/attachments/20160305/a86065eb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the osmocom-sdr mailing list