This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:35:01PM +0200, Max wrote: > Hi. > > Thank you for your contribution. Could you clarify - what's the > advantage of this approach over existing osmo_t4_decode() function? > Is there some test case which works for one but not the other? Not sure if it answers your question, but Sangamesh has posted a description of the patch a while ago in this and the following mails: Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:43:36 +0000 From: Sangamesh Sajjan <Sangamesh.Sajjan at radisys.com> To: "osmocom-net-gprs at lists.osmocom.org" <osmocom-net-gprs at lists.osmocom.org> Subject: Proposal for new structure definition for compression algorithm ~Neels -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/osmocom-net-gprs/attachments/20160331/b60a77ae/attachment.bin>