This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Mychaela Falconia mychaela.falconia at gmail.comHi Morteza, This may be a silly question, but my most immediate and most natural reaction to your inquiry is a little different from Harald's. Harald's response focuses on the notion that FLOSS communities like Osmocom should not be helping proprietary software developers/users, but I see an even more fundamental question in need of answering: just *why* are you implementing your own SGSN, as opposed to using already existing OsmoSGSN+OsmoHNBGW? If you consider the existing Osmocom implementation to be poor and prefer to write your own alternative mostly from scratch (I am often guilty of the exact same behaviour: I just wrote from scratch my own suite of tools for programming SIM cards instead of improving Osmocom community's existing pySim tools), then why are you not releasing your own alternative version as Published Source Software? Perhaps I missed it, but I never saw you post a link to the source for your alternative SGSN. Just trying to understand, Mother Mychaela P.S. Published Source Software (PSS) is my preferred term for ALL software whose source code is freely published on the Internet by the authors or maintainers of the sw in question, regardless of whether it is under a free license or not - thus it is a more expansive category than FLOSS. FLOSS is a proper subset of PSS.