This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Xaver Zu xaver1zu at gmail.com> Yes. But, as other people stated, it is likely a significant effort, > and there are other SDR devices that ship with fully open source > software, sometimes not only software but even FPGA gateware or even > open source hardware. Which SDRs with PCIe do you remember? I know about XTRX. Master osmo-trx does not support it. And I know about limesdr-pcie, I'm not convinced that it makes sense to buy in this state of development. I don't know about GPL compatible PCIe SDR with Analog Devices AD93XX family chip. Results of SDR based on the Analog Devices versus Lime chip are in favor of Analog Devices. I did a simple DSB modulation test. Analog Devices has a cleaner spectrum, better carrier suppression. This is what I noticed first on the spectrum analyzer. Does anyone know of an SDR combining PCIe and an AD93XX chip that has the potential to be supported by osmo-trx? Does anyone know about such a CPRI for PCIe? I don't need it but libsdr.so supports it. I think this can be of benefit to the community. Xaver pá 11. 9. 2020 v 23:00 odesílatel Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> napsal: > Hi Xaver, > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 08:09:16PM +0200, Xaver Zu wrote: > > Is it possible in its current form to have it in any branch? > > I would prefer not to have it in a branch of the official repository. > > > Can it at least stay in the gerrit? > > I see no problem with having it in gerrit. I will add a related review > comment that the patch was rejected due to licensing concerns. I don't > think copyright prevents us from publicly documenting our development > process and reltaed decisions. > > > Could I solve this with an open source (GPL) reimplementation of that > > library? > > Yes. But, as other people stated, it is likely a significant effort, > and there are other SDR devices that ship with fully open source > software, sometimes not only software but even FPGA gateware or even > open source hardware. > > By all means, don't let me discourage you from implementing an open > source alternative to that library. I just think there are other > SDR devices available, which most likely have a much larger user base > (at least in terms of FOSS projects like Osmocom, srsLTE, ...) > > Regards, > Harald > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> > http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > > ============================================================================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. > A6) > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20200913/a7cca6cf/attachment.htm>