This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Vadim Yanitskiy axilirator at gmail.comHi Harald, > I'm not quite sure if I follow your argument here. From my point of > view, the importance is that we test build on those platforms/compilers > that most of our users actually use. So I would rather argue for > testing with (the gcc versions of) various recent releases of popular > GNU/Linux distributions or on different CPUs such as ARM, than to > introduce a compiler version that isn't even included in latest FreeBSD > (11). Thanks for response, your point of view makes sense. > Also, as a compromise proposal: we don't necessarily have to do it as > part of the testing of each and every commit. It might be sufficient to > do this e.g. once as part of a daily/nightly job which sends e-mails to > the author of the commit that broke? Great idea! Let's see, what other developers think about that... With best regards, Vadim Yanitskiy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20170509/ac702e84/attachment.htm>