This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:37:12PM +0800, Holger Freyther wrote: > I can't comment if osmo-msc-gerrit is using a different container than > other builds. Until recently only OpenBSC and OpenBSC-gerrit were using docker. osmo-msc and osmo-msc-gerrit were copied from (one of) those, hence those are also using docker. osmo-{bsc,mgw,sgsn} don't exist yet but could do the same. They (will) use the same docker image. The mentioned vty tests port conflicts are related to the build matrix containing eight different builds, which can be parallelized by using the docker container; and also allows building separate patches in parrallel. Unfortunately, documenting the jenkins setup while tweaking it is time consuming and tends to become outdated quickly. I think documenting our entire setup is nontrivial. I did so for the osmo-gsm-tester jobs, which takes up a large part of the osmo-gsm-tester manual. We need to find a feasible balance of detail, which I guess should be rather coarse. Numerous documentation and wiki restructuring tasks for Osmocom components themselves are continuously pending and IMHO higher in priority. ~N -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20170827/7dc23a13/attachment.bin>