This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Freyther holger at freyther.deGood Evening, this is a bit of speculation but Keith showed me a trace with some network delay that makes a case for using FSM for the lchan itself. It seems the following can happen: * LU REJECT * Start Channel Release ** Send RR Release to the MS ** Deactivate SACCH ** Start Timer ... network transmission issues... at least 5s * SACCH deactivate timeout ** Start error release procedure.. ... * LATE RELEASE INDICATION arrives triggering other release procedure? So with a proper FSM we would have transitioned into the error path and would just ignore the RELEASE INDICATION. The question is if someone has budget to do a FSM transition here? I will try to build a simulated testcase for that. The other part that seems to happen (and I don't understand yet): * Allocating a lchan before it is fully freed?! * The BTS sending us RF Channel Releasse ACK twice cheers holger