This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.deOn Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:14:32AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > * RACH for packet service is not equal PRACH. PRACH is a dedicated > logical channel on the Um interface that _can_ be enabled (like PBCCH, > PCCCH, ...) but whihc is neither supported by osmo-bts/osmo-pcu, nor > used anywhere. The 3GPP removed the PBCCH/PCCCH and all related > channels several years ago from the specs, as there was no operator > known to use any of them. So new handsets no longer (have to) support > those channels, which means it is utterly useless for a new > implementation like the Osmocom one to bother to support them. Ah, good to know. Is PTCCH also one of those? It sounds similar, but I guess not? https://osmocom.org/issues/1796 ~Neels -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20160909/e8058c15/attachment.bin>