This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Alexander Chemeris alexander.chemeris at gmail.comHi Holger, On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger at freyther.de> wrote: > E.g. in one > of the testcases I noticed that you don't use C99 initializers but the > old/error prone way of initializing. :) Yes, I think in this particular case the old way is more compact and thus more readable. I added C99 initializers to the test (see the patch attached or achemeris/sms-fixes branch) and to me it looks less readable and thus more error prone. If you see any benefits of this patch - feel free to merge it, though. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. CEO, Fairwaves, Inc. / ООО УмРадио https://fairwaves.co -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-sms_test-Use-C99-initializers.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 7513 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20140316/e5572080/attachment.bin>