This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Peter Stuge peter at stuge.seAlexander Chemeris wrote: > > The command looks pretty horrible. Do you think that there could be a > > better user interface than a single command with 16 parameters? > > > > I'd suggest something like: rach access control class (0..15) (0|1) > > I like our way more, as it's a single line vs many-many lines. A > single line doesn't occupy so much screen space and is easier to > manipulate from VTY or over a slow satellite connection (happen > frequently here). Also it gives you the whole picture in a single > glance. > > Does it sound like a valid reason? No not the least. Compare: rach access control classes 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 with: rach access control class 1 1 rach access control class 2 1 rach access control class 5 0 rach access control class 5 1 rach access control class 8 1 rach access control class 13 1 rach access control class 14 1 I know which I find clearer, and easier to manipulate with a minimum of unwanted side effects. "The connectivity to my sites suck" really can't motivate such a bad user interface. Use mosh and/or train operators to deal with higher latency connections. //Peter PS. Did you notice the error in my 'class' commands? PPS. Did you notice the error in your 'classes' command?