This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Alexander Chemeris alexander.chemeris at gmail.comOn Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote: > > Ivan Kluchnikov wrote: > > +DEFUN(cfg_bts_rach_ac_classes, cfg_bts_rach_ac_classes_cmd, > > + "rach access control classes (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) x (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1)", > > + RACH_STR > > + "Access control classes\n" > > + "Access control classes\n" > > + "Access control classes\n" > > + "Access is NOT barred for ACC 0\n" > > + "Access is barred for ACC 0\n" > > + "Access is NOT barred for ACC 1\n" > .. > > The command looks pretty horrible. Do you think that there could be a > better user interface than a single command with 16 parameters? > > I'd suggest something like: rach access control class (0..15) (0|1) I like our way more, as it's a single line vs many-many lines. A single line doesn't occupy so much screen space and is easier to manipulate from VTY or over a slow satellite connection (happen frequently here). Also it gives you the whole picture in a single glance. Does it sound like a valid reason? -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио http://fairwaves.ru