This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Adam B boardsofcanada at live.co.ukThanks guys for your help I've been using OpenBTS too long and assumed setting up asterisk with the nanoBTS with NITB would operate with similar configurations. I couldnt quite understand why there was no pairing of IMSI's in the asterisk configs but that is all self explanitory now and thus I now have calls routing through (all be it with no audio yet!) but I am sure that will be solved easily. I am mainly wanting to use Asterisk integration so I can use this to inject SMS's and have full control of the entire PDU to send different types of SMS. I chose Asterisk purely because I have a set up to do this with openBTS but wanting to upgrade to nanoBTS. Maybe I am trying to create something that has no doubt been done before but I can't find any documentation on how send a full SMS-Deliver PDU in to the nanoBTS. Any knowledge or pointers here would be great, this is something that I wouldnt mind to contribute to if there is not this type of capability already available. Regards Adam > From: alexander.chemeris at gmail.com > Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:18:48 +0400 > Subject: Re: Help with Asterisk setup to stop Openbsc registering handsets > To: boardsofcanada at live.co.uk > CC: openbsc at lists.osmocom.org > > Adam, > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Adam B <boardsofcanada at live.co.uk> wrote: > > Anyway my problem is that I don't know how to prevent OpenBSC from using its > > own HLR and instead forward all phones that want to register to my nanoBTS > > to do so via Asterisk. > > Unfortunately, NITB doesn't have an external interface for > registrations yet and thus LCR can't forward them to SIP. > > We use Freeswitch instead of Asterisk and there we configure > Freeswitch in "gateway" mode. In this mode where FS doesn't take > decision about a user availability bu itself, it just forwards all > calls to relevant interface (LCR SIP interface in this case). > > Adding an external interface for user registration to NITB and > converting it to SIP would be a great step towards a more SIP-friendly > architecture. Feel free to contribute ;) > > -- > Regards, > Alexander Chemeris. > CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио > http://fairwaves.ru > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20130705/df4bfdda/attachment.htm>