Re[2]: Non-synchronized handover

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Dmitri Soloviev dmisol at mail.ru
Thu Nov 1 18:50:32 UTC 2012


Thank you Harald.

I discovered that there is a single alive nanoBTS in the hackerspace :(
But we also discovered that you have a perfect OpenBSC code that can be studied :)

Regards,
Dmitri

Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:22:21 +0100 от Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>:
>	
>
>
	
	
>
		
		
			
>Hi Alexander and Dmitri,
>
>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:33:28AM +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
>
> Dimitri, we have a working OpenBSC/nanoBTS installation at the hackerspace.
>
> If you find out how to issue a handover command in OpenBSC, you could try
>
> by yourself.
>
>
You cannot issue a handover command manually in OpenBSC.  The way how we
>
test handover is to use two BTSs connected to one OsmoNITB, and use
>
rotary/adjustable attenuators in the Tx path to make one BTS signal
>
weaker than the other BTS, at which point the handover algorithm will
>
kick in and perform the hand-over.
>
>
The DMEAS and the DHO debug logging might be useful to monitor what is
>
happening while you're doing that.
>
>
Regards,
>
	Harald
>
-- 
>
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
>
============================================================================
>
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
>
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
>
			
		
		
	

	
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20121101/26009842/attachment.htm>


More information about the OpenBSC mailing list