This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Alexander Chemeris alexander.chemeris at gmail.comHi Harald, I've seen successful events of all kinds, both using online presence and not. It solely depends on the attitude of the audience and that's why I was asking about it. I apologize that it introduced too much noise. I will respect any choice, I just want to make sure we make as many people happy as possible. Regarding my Skype note - for me it's similar to using Altium where I would love to use an open-source app. I always prefer open-source as you know, but I'm quite pragmatic in tools selection when it affects my performance of working on open-source projects. I again apologize for mentioning it where it's not appropriate. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:20, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > I really wanted OsmoDevCon to be an even from Osmocom (+related) > develoeprs for such developers, with the idea of working together > intensely and sharing some experiences face-to-face. > > I also understand not everyone is able to attend, for scheduling, travel > or simply because they didn't realize about the event in time. > > I think broadcasting at least some the presentations (not general > discussions) via SIP or any other audio streaming method might be ok, > but I would make that dependent on the individual speaker. For > discussions or other non-presentations, I don't think it's a good idea. > Talking privately in a room full of people is one thing, talking while > it is publicly streamed and possibly recorded an entirely different > thing. > > Having remote presenters is also not what I had in mind. We might > consider that if one of the scheduled speakers is unable to attend, but > not as a planned scenario for events that are not even scheduled. > > Furthermore, I'm not a big fan of active participation by remote parties > either, I fear it has a huge potential to delay the event. > > Now there might be occasional exceptions, i.e. somebody not present at > the event but still actively involved in one particular subject that we > want to discuss. In that case having a teleconference via SIP or other > method may be appropriate for that given topic / person. > > If I understood correctly, Sylvain and Peter have suggested to take care > of it from the technical/infrastructure side. I appreciate that and we > may use it where apropriate (see above). > > btw: I strongly discourage the use of skype in the context of Osmocom by > all means! We're working very hard to create Free Software > implementations of open-specified communications protocols. Let's not > make the world more complicated by using (and thus suggesting it was > appropriate to use) completely proprietary communications systems. > > Regards, > Harald > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > ============================================================================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris.