This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
David A. Burgess dburgess at jcis.netHarald - I largely agree, and apologize if my request was misunderstood or expanded beyond its original intent. Also, that is a good point about Skype. -- David On Feb 20, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Harald Welte wrote: > Hi all! > > I really wanted OsmoDevCon to be an even from Osmocom (+related) > develoeprs for such developers, with the idea of working together > intensely and sharing some experiences face-to-face. > > I also understand not everyone is able to attend, for scheduling, travel > or simply because they didn't realize about the event in time. > > I think broadcasting at least some the presentations (not general > discussions) via SIP or any other audio streaming method might be ok, > but I would make that dependent on the individual speaker. For > discussions or other non-presentations, I don't think it's a good idea. > Talking privately in a room full of people is one thing, talking while > it is publicly streamed and possibly recorded an entirely different > thing. > > Having remote presenters is also not what I had in mind. We might > consider that if one of the scheduled speakers is unable to attend, but > not as a planned scenario for events that are not even scheduled. > > Furthermore, I'm not a big fan of active participation by remote parties > either, I fear it has a huge potential to delay the event. > > Now there might be occasional exceptions, i.e. somebody not present at > the event but still actively involved in one particular subject that we > want to discuss. In that case having a teleconference via SIP or other > method may be appropriate for that given topic / person. > > If I understood correctly, Sylvain and Peter have suggested to take care > of it from the technical/infrastructure side. I appreciate that and we > may use it where apropriate (see above). > > btw: I strongly discourage the use of skype in the context of Osmocom by > all means! We're working very hard to create Free Software > implementations of open-specified communications protocols. Let's not > make the world more complicated by using (and thus suggesting it was > appropriate to use) completely proprietary communications systems. > > Regards, > Harald > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > ============================================================================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)