This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Maria Tzamtzi m.tzamtzi at gmail.comHarald Welte <laforge <at> gnumonks.org> writes: > > Responding to the only question that zecke did not respond to: > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:07:28PM +0300, jason mercury wrote: > > > 3) Could I send SMS in which extension of the sender is text not integer. > > no, this doesn't work with the current architecture. We also don't want > to work on a quick fix but rather "outsource" the full SMS processing into > a separate process. For that we need a clean API/interface/protocol how > the MSC-part of bsc_hack and that external process interact, and that again > will probably be based on our TCAP/MAP implementation, which is under active > development. I would like to ask you about the "quick fix" you mention when there is text in the extension field. Does this fix affect the gsm_subscriber or the gsm_sms structure? Is it something that affects only a few files or it is necessary to make major modifications?