This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgHi Philipp,
thanks for your feedback.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
> Thanks to some hints from Sylvain my nanoBTS 140 is working now.
> We found the following problems:
> * Software Activation request is not complete ( it needs to contain tag +
> FILE_ID and FILE_VERSION). See patch sent by Sylvain.
Ok, I will look into this patch as soon as I have some time.
> * It's relevant which Software is activated, but our logic to always use the
> first SW Description record works most of the time because the nanoBTS will
> move the software that was activated the last time to the first position.
>
> So maybe we need hard-code which software to prefer for activation or we put
> some warnings in the wiki.
why? If you say we are activating the most recently activated software, why is
there a need for a warning of any sort? Or why would we need to hardcode?
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)