This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Eric Cathelinaud e.cathelinaud at googlemail.comDid anyone try a Samsung mobile phone? I tried 3 different kind of Samsung and none of them can attach to the network (but they can see it with manual research). Problems with : Samsung U600 Samsung PlayerAddict I900 Samsung E840 Working fine with Nokia and Ericsson mobile phones Eric Cathelinaud 2009/6/25 Nordin <bouchtaoui at gmail.com> > > No. It means the PDA might first try to register with that Dutch TMSI and >> then the network will need to explicitly request the IMSI. It's not >> supposed to use that Dutch TMSI in France, but it might try if there's a bug >> in its GSM stack. >> > > Well I'm sorry, but I'm still not convinced about that. Cause that would be > a major bug, which won't be accepted by the biggest user group for PDA > phones (like business men, or presidents like Obama). > > Ah. Sorry. You are probably correct then. There's something about the >> BCCH that the phone doesn't like. >> > > That's I think is most likely the case. > > That's part of what I mean by TMSI resolution: if you can't recognize or >> support the TMSI, turn around and request the IMSI. >> > > Yeah, that is what OpenBSC does, I think. But Harald, Holger, Dieter and > others know more about it. > > The problem, sometimes, is that some phones don't drop the TMSI. They >> insist on using it, even when it should have been invalidated. >> > > In that case, I would see some negotiations from the debug bsc_hack, which > there is not. So my assumption is still some missing information in the BCCH > channel. Cause once again, trying to register to my BTS manually failed and > I don't see any attempt to do just a simple Radio Resource request. The > latter one I can't confirm that for 100 %, because it's possible the debug > doesn't show all of that. > > The only way we could get the Treo 650 to stop sending us AT&T's old TMSI >> was to assign it one of our own. >> > > Well, at least the Treo talked to you. > > >>> c u later... >>> >> >> Not if I c u first... ;-) >> > uhhhh....c u soon? :) > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20090625/30f59f29/attachment.htm>