This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/op25-dev@lists.osmocom.org/.
Steve Glass stevie.glass at gmail.comCongratulations Balint! I've also been looking at this from the Python side but had some problems. One of which is the demod just looks flaky in 3.6 (both Frank's original and the version I copied into our tree) - the symbols seem rather sparse and I am failing to decode frame headers properly. Then I read this: The IT++ 4.2 BCH problem still exists, so I’ve used the alternate > implementation that Max also uses in the ‘repeater’ code to handle > identification of the frame header. What's the problem with the BCH decoder in IT++? This could be part of my problem so I'd appreciate more info. Shall take a look at Max's code for that too but I was so convinced I'd got a different error that I was picking one problem at a time and not got to the scope.py application yet. Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/op25-dev/attachments/20120927/f3c77016/attachment.htm>