This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/22306 ) Change subject: gbproxy: Use separate NS-VC for data / signalling on SGSN side ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/22306/1/gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn File gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/22306/1/gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn@88 PS1, Line 88: nsvci := 201 > Should we change the naming here to have nsei 101, 201, ... and nsvci for 101 be 101, 102, ... […] I don't really care too much. My main concern when doing suhc kind of allocations is to not use the same number at several levels. So NSEI 101 with NSVCI 101 is a bad idea, as you would pass the test even if the code would once use the NSEI where the NSVCI is supposed to be used, and vice-versa. Still, some similarity maskes sense. But one could e.g. use NSE 1001 with NSVCI 1101, 1102, ... - in any case, it's outside of this patch. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/22306 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If0e404bdf2c30a5e18748695608611be83f61109 Gerrit-Change-Number: 22306 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis at fe80.eu> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:03:21 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: daniel <dwillmann at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210119/567d83c3/attachment.htm>