Change in osmo-bts[master]: osmo-bts-trx/scheduler: refactor dummy burst scheduling

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

fixeria gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Mon Jun 29 09:58:42 UTC 2020


fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/19029 )

Change subject: osmo-bts-trx/scheduler: refactor dummy burst scheduling
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/19029/1/src/osmo-bts-trx/scheduler_trx.c 
File src/osmo-bts-trx/scheduler_trx.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/19029/1/src/osmo-bts-trx/scheduler_trx.c@105 
PS1, Line 105: 				c0_mask |= (1 << tn);
> Why not simply moving all the code below inside this if condition and you don't need to work with th […]
As I wrote in the commit message, you cannot immediately send a Dummy Burst here when freq. hopping is in use. If you do this here, then what if the next transceiver would want to send a Normal Bursts on ARFCN of C0? That's why we postpone dummy burst scheduling.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/19029/1/src/osmo-bts-trx/scheduler_trx.c@124 
PS1, Line 124: 		if (c0_mask & (1 << br.tn))
> don't you need to do the opposite? send when this holds true?
'1'B means that a burst was [already] sent, otherwise we send a dummy burst.



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/19029
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8c3651c27d2991079e83b8abdb7e2c3f95b97a43
Gerrit-Change-Number: 19029
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:58:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200629/db2f3eff/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list