This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/21263 )
Change subject: Introduce osmo-ran docker image set up
......................................................................
Patch Set 6: Code-Review+1
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/21263/6/osmo-ran/Dockerfile
File osmo-ran/Dockerfile:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/21263/6/osmo-ran/Dockerfile@42
PS6, Line 42: less \
: apt-utils \
: strace \
: tcpdump \
: telnet \
: vim \
: osmo-bsc \
: osmo-bsc-ipaccess-utils \
: osmo-bts-trx \
: osmo-mgw \
: osmo-pcu \
: osmo-trx-ipc \
: osmo-trx-uhd && \
except of apt-utils the two lists seem identical. Might make sense to keep the common list of packages in some variable and then use it in both clauses? Not critical, but would IMHO increase maintainability and have less risk of breaking only either of the two at some later change.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/21263
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: docker-playground
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If5d22e9fa818310cbb4adc34bd7aceb4416ec969
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21263
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:07:32 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20201211/e87bdc1b/attachment.htm>