This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
fed to LAPDm at all. So when you get a L2 packet from L1, instead of blindly feeding it to LAPDm, you should check a LPD handler table to know who to feed it to, and for normal channels there would only be handler for LAPDm and for CBCH channel there would be no LAPDm handler and only a LPD=01 handler. > In the future, we can also add the BTS-side implementation. I don't > think they can share much code, If they can't share code, then, I would make sure to mark the method to be 'ms' side so as to keep the namespace clear. Also, I would stick to the convention we used for sms and name it something like gsm412_ms_entity (and same for the methods) > but it might make sense to have both in the same place. That's not really the policy we used so far. Only shared code goes to libosmo-xxx If it ever comes a time where we need it in another project, it'll still be time to move it there then. > I can spin a patch series directly on top of osmocom-bb, but the > testcases will probably not make it. Why ? layer23 is auto-tools based as well, copying the test suite stuff from libosmocore shouldn't be too hard. Cheers, Sylvain