port numbers in FakeTRX / trxcon

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.

Vadim Yanitskiy axilirator at gmail.com
Fri Feb 23 10:09:01 UTC 2018

Hi Harald,

> I think it's not the best idea to re-use the same port numbers / port
> number range on the MS side which are used on the network side.  Is
> there any requirement to do so?  why not simply shift the entire base
> port (5700) on the client side to something else like 6700?

There is and was no requirement. I didn't expect this problem
during the initial development process of trxcon, but then also
started to think about changing the default port range.

So, I definitely agree with you and 6700 is fine for me.
I've already updated your change to use it:


With best regards,
Vadim Yanitskiy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20180223/ecc378c2/attachment.htm>

More information about the baseband-devel mailing list