Creating GSM Users Association (GSMUA)
thayyil at yandex.com
Mon Jun 12 21:13:24 UTC 2017
> >>> it becomes offtopic
sorry i will divert it now
>i said kidding
because i felt you worrried much like a kid :) sorry laugh it off
> I don't know what you mean by "calypso bb", but OsmocomBB started
while i writing your in mind so osmocom becomes calypso
> But when I tried it again earlier today
> while in the process of composing this response to you,
thank you for spending your time on this
> * According to the marketing info that I could easily find for this
> chip(set), it seems to be CDMA/3GPP2-oriented,
no it supports GSm . source contain gsm related files.
and practical realworld chips used in sony and lg supports gsm
> Being able to build my own
> hardware starting from just chips is an absolute requirement for me,
yes i got it ..
your with a specific hardware .
> Overall, it is pretty clear to me that we are on different paths with
> very different interests and goals.
sorry for last coments i mistaken you as osmocom member from starting.
your right qcom leaks canot be complete replacement for calypso .
but i suggested another way which dosent need datasheets or any hw info
# i suggested to add a compatiblity layer on top of layer1 code of qcom leak . ( do we need hw info )
so layer2 3 of osmocombb can communicate with it.( if no hw specific info have to send recive)
i agree its not much usefull for hw geek because
datasheets unavialable so custom board difficult (schematcs may avilabel because phones )
and in softwear side extending proprietery code and hosting only extended part related legal view is out of my knowlege.
More information about the baseband-devel