nuttx-bb layout? inside or outside nuttx?
craig_comstock at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 26 03:03:44 UTC 2016
I'll pursue side-by-side then as that seemed best to me also.
My plan was to start with an rssi app, do layer1 and get that working with mobile on a laptop, then work on porting mobile to nuttx.
I'll be working on an mt6260-based watch and an mt2502/6261-based rephone module primarily.
From: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
To: Craig Comstock <craig_comstock at yahoo.com>
Cc: Sylvain Munaut <246tnt at gmail.com>; Holger Freyther <holger at freyther.de>; baseband-devel <baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: nuttx-bb layout? inside or outside nuttx?
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 01:32:55PM +0000, Craig Comstock wrote:
> I am working on porting nuttx-bb to fernvale (mediatek 6260/6261). I was
> starting work with gnutoo's sources which seem to be pulling osmocom-bb into
> nuttx/apps/osmocomBB and yet I feel like previous nuttx-bb was using osmocom
> alongside nuttx (so that osmocom-bb is kept by itself). This second layout
> seems better to me... so that osmocom-bb is more "preserved" as-is.
I agree, it would be bets to have it side-by-side
> I know there are differences in the code environments but it seems
> those could be handled by making macros in nuttx so that nuttx can
> compile osmocom code.
I'm not opposed to introducing macros / function tables / APIs /
whatever else in osmocom-bb to make it more portable. So modifying
osmocom-bb is definitely possible - but it should always continue to
build + work "bare iron" outside the context of nuttx, at the very least
as long as that work regarding Nuttx hasn't completed fully for quite
Looking forward to your progress.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the baseband-devel