This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://email@example.com/.Alexander Huemer alexander.huemer at xx.vu
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:49:43AM +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On 11/24/2011 10:36 AM, Alexander Huemer wrote: > > > Steve and Holger raised some reasonable concerns on some of the other > > patches, it seems I was quite unconcentrated and they are mostly crap. > > crap? no, not at all. I agree that we should get the number of warnings down, > sometimes a warning just needs something else than the straight forward fix. > Compiler warnings are of course controversial. I personally think that osmocom-bb and friends are fine pieces of code and deserve a kind of "polished" look when compiling. Some warnings are also quite strong indications of bugs like "... makes pointer from integer without a cast" and things like that. I myself don't know how to handle e.g. "discards qualifiers from pointer target type" when the constness of lvalue and rvalue don't match. Maybe it doesn't actually matter so much and I am just pedantic.