This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Sébastien Lorquet squalyl at gmail.comthe students in his love girl's school. Sebastien On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Zauner <azet at azet.org> wrote: > What poor students are you talking of? > > azet > > On 1/23/11, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote: > > Marten Christophe wrote: > >> Kindly give me code or even binary file for sniff code which > >> Sylvain demonstrated in chao meeting, > > > > Kindly read > > > http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/2010-December/000912.html > > > > > >> Pls reply > >> pls help > >> or pls advise > >> Kindly reply > >> pls provide > > > > I'm sure you realize that this sounds like a nagging child. > > > > I think one can always beenfit from considering the group that one is > > communicating in. Many quite skilled developers work together in this > > and most other open source projects, and the way to get things that > > one wants is never to nag. > > > > At best one will be silently ignored, at worst one will get banned. > > In any case, the impression people will be left with suffers > > dramatically from any behavior not clearly trying to further the > > project. I have seen this happen in many projects, and many times I > > am sure that it is caused mainly by problems in communication, such > > as language barriers, rhetoric skill, and so on. Other times it is > > simply because someone is stupid. (I don't know you at all well > > enough to say if that holds for you, probably not, but your emails > > may cause people to think so.) > > > > > >> advise me how i can modify existing code up to that level. > > .. > >> it will help me allot, my NGO can deploy a pilot project at least > > > > I guess you are still working on the idea that developers here fairly > > clearly judged as not being really worthwhile. And now you plea for > > people to go out of their way to support it. That demonstrates a lack > > of understanding for open source projects, where *you* are always > > responsible for fulfilling *your* needs. Of course you can ask others > > to do stuff, by politely making suggestions, but you must respect if > > they have no interest in your ideas. > > > > But nothing stops you from moving ahead on your own and proving > > everyone wrong! In fact that is one great thing about open source. > > When going against the flow of course you must be prepared to not > > get much, if any, help. > > > > Maybe Sylvain will be interested in licensing some work to your NGO > > for a pilot project - if so I guess he will get in touch with you - > > but honestly I doubt that, based on nothing but how you behave on > > this mailing list. :\ > > > > Besides the tone in your email you have hijacked the thread about the > > Osmocom logo request. This suggests unfamiliarity with mailing list > > etiquette, which also hurts your standing in the project rather > > severely. One could think this should not be so important, because it > > is a technicality, but on the other hand we are all technicians, and > > the technicalities are there for a reason; they allow the most > > efficient communication. So by not knowing the etiquette you are > > creating inefficiencies for every mailing list subscriber and for the > > afterworld (in the archives) which as I am sure you understand is > > very strongly frowned upon. > > > > > > Perhaps you could benefit from the recently announced TETRA code.. > > > > http://tetra.osmocom.org/trac/ > > > > Maybe it fits your application better than plain GSM, as you seem to > > be on good terms with the regulatory body in your deployment area. > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > //Peter > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20110123/81aa27dc/attachment.htm>