Toolchain tests, problems and a few workarounds...

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.

Wolfram Sang wolfram at the-dreams.de
Sun Jan 2 11:19:22 UTC 2011


Hi,

at 27c3, I tested some toolchains with osmocom-bb and found a few
build-problems, even with the recommended gnuarm-3.4.3. I want to
document them here, so other people can find hints about it.

*** GNUARM 3.4.3 TOOLCHAIN

master branch
=============

../../src/rate_ctr.c:24:22: inttypes.h: No such file or directory

Holger suggested to manually remove this line. It is fixed upstream
in libosmocore and osmocom-bb needs to be synced to it. Please do :)

remotes/origin/steve-m/loader_sciphone
======================================

1) First problem is:

In file included from ../../include/osmocore/msgb.h:23,
                 from ../../src/msgb.c:27:
/home/wsa/Dev/osmocom-bb/src/target/firmware/include/stdint.h:13:25: stdint.h: No such file or directory

Cherry-picking e0a605819c39187a494e43cf591f2e79a9d9903f (stdint.h: Next attempt at making this work with various compilers) helps.

2) It then runs into the problem of the master branch.

3) After this is fixed, I get

../../../src/codec/gsm610.c:24:20: stdint.h: No such file or directory
../../../src/codec/gsm610.c:33: error: parse error before "gsm610_bitorder"

which needs 733c894c18c127ce5c023e39609b7d2b9e748e7e (build: Use absolute path in the CFLAGS for libosmocore target build) as a fix.

4) This then, leads to:

arm-elf-ld: address 0x400054d4 of board/mt62xx/loader.mtkram.elf section .text is not within region LRAM

which is sadly also present when you just cherry-pick the main patch

d04761d19c432201f7c0f10c72f788fb695d466a ([WIP] Modify loader for use as first stage bootloader on MT62xx devices)

on top of current master + its build fix. So, does it seem sensible to simply
rebase this branch to master which would eliminate the first three problems?
Or at least cherry-pick the above fixes?

Also, the workarounds for gcc3 do not look very sustainable (see custom stdint.h).
Is it a mid-term option to remove that stuff if a reliable pre-built gcc4 is
available? (I am working on that, see below).

BTW the linker error was not further worked on yet. I got a prebuilt binary now.
It is possibly helpful to put it on the G2-wikipage, so people wanting to
work on the Linux-support only are spared from the above hassle.

*** CUSTOM 4.3.2 TOOLCHAIN

every branch
============

The configure-stage of libosmocom already fails for the target with error
77. The config.log says in detail:

configure:3231: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:3253: arm-elf-gcc -Os -ffunction-sections -I/home/wsa/Dev/osmocom-bb/src/target/firmware/include   conftest.c  >&5
/home/opt/OSELAS.Toolchain-1.99.3/arm-elf/gcc-4.3.2-newlib-1.16.0-binutils-2.18/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.3.2/../../../../arm-elf/lib/libc.a(lib_a-exit.o): In function `exit':
/home/mkl/himalia-pengutronix/toolchain/releases/OSELAS.Toolchain-1.99.3.6/platform-arm-elf-gcc-4.3.2-newlib-1.16.0-binutils-2.18/build-target/newlib-1.16.0/newlib/libc/stdlib/exit.c:65: undefined reference to `_exit'
/home/opt/OSELAS.Toolchain-1.99.3/arm-elf/gcc-4.3.2-newlib-1.16.0-binutils-2.18/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.3.2/../../../../arm-elf/lib/libc.a(lib_a-sbrkr.o): In function `_sbrk_r':
/home/mkl/himalia-pengutronix/toolchain/releases/OSELAS.Toolchain-1.99.3.6/platform-arm-elf-gcc-4.3.2-newlib-1.16.0-binutils-2.18/build-target/newlib-1.16.0/newlib/libc/reent/sbrkr.c:60: undefined reference to `_sbrk'

27c3 was too interesting ;) so I haven't fixed this yet. The Mac-toolchains
also throw this and I also have seen it on the list before, so I hope I
can work on it the next days.

So much for now. It would be nice if someone with write-access to the repo
could comment on my questions and/or fix the low-hanging fruits. I will 
hopefully be able to send some updates soon, too (famous last words).

It was great to meet you all in person!

All the best,

   Wolfram




More information about the baseband-devel mailing list