Nuttx / Performance (was Re: Creating a real usable phone using OsmocomBB)
laforge at gnumonks.org
Mon Dec 12 11:07:43 UTC 2011
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:17:35PM +0200, Scott Weisman wrote:
> I don't know if the previous discussion/decision regarding NuttX stands.
> This (limited) RTOS benchmark looked interesting to me:
I am not overly worried by that. From my point of view, aspects like
the POSIX-style API and the general structure of the code have much more
significance than absolute scheduler latency.
It would be great to see some work on getting more of our existing
drivers for the calypso ported into NuttX.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the baseband-devel